Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
   Short Film Critique: 
   Fish Eye

   Director:
Jordan Copeland
   Expected Rating: PG for mature themes
   Distribution: No Exclusive Distribution
   Budget: $7,000
   Genre: Drama

   Running Time: 21 minutes

   Release Dates: December 15, 2005
   Website: http://www.tentaclefilms.com
   Trailer: Click Here
   Review Date: June 15, 2006
   Reviewed By: Monika DeLeeuw-Taylor
Final Score:
7.6
How do we critique films? Click Here To See.

"The Observer sees the world in a very specific way. It has to. There just isn't any way to look at the world from every angle at once."

This is, in essence, the theme of the short film Fish Eye.

Alex is a newspaper writer who is bored with his life, tired of his boss, and feeling increasingly claustrophobic both in his cubicle and in his tiny apartment. While leaving a Halloween party one night, he is handed a fish in a bag of water by a little girl wearing devil horns. Alex takes the fish back to his apartment and begins to take care of it, because its plight of being stuck in such a tiny living space seems to echo Alex's own claustrophobia.

Dissatisfied with his boss' narrow worldview, Alex finds an old typewriter and sets himself up on a street corner, promising "instant novels" to passers-by. He asks them a few questions about their life, and then hastily turns out a well-written short story that sums them up as a person. At first, people pay him little heed and simply look at him as if he is crazy. But gradually, one-by-one, people being to sit down next to Alex and begin to tell him some of their most important life stories, about their hopes and dreams, or just about life in general. Alex soon becomes obsessed with the lives of these people -so much so that he completely neglects his own, almost to the point of insanity.

Frustrated by his claustrophobic job and its narrow worldview...
...Alex embarks on a quest to escape his fish-bowl type existence.

Content
The idea of living in a fish bowl, feeling closed into a small, confined space, only being about to see the world from that one narrow perspective- this is something that the artistic mind throughout the centuries has been trying to escape. It seems even more ironic that now in an age of increased technology and awareness about the world, people tend to be gravitating toward a fish bowl kind of existence -crammed into office cubicles or cookie-cutter houses in a sort of self-imposed solitary confinement. This film reminded me almost of Fight Club, in that a man who is dissatisfied with his life attempts to change it in a way that is initially productive, yet later spirals out of control.

The actor who played Alex did a very good job at portraying this Jack-like character, as did all of the extras whose stories he wrote. I especially liked the montage of people relating their lives to Alex as he obsessively typed them out. My favorite moments, however, were when Alex was writing his first two stories -about Yvette the wannabe ballerina and Mr. Nistler the adulterous art teacher-; Alex actually pictures him and his typewriter as observers in the story. This is even more interesting than just the vignettes themselves, and considering how involved Alex becomes in these stories later on, this is a really nice touch.

There were a few moments, however, in which it was difficult to make sense of exactly what was happening in the film, because some of the scenes were shown out if chronological order. For instance, we see Alex sitting at the street corner with his typewriter fairly early on in the movie, yet it is much later that we actually see him pulling the typewriter out of its plastic storage case. On the one hand, this does fit in with the slightly dreamlike element of the film itself, as well as Alex's obsessive and rather disjointed nature. Still, at this point the audience is still in the process of figuring out this character, and how his sitting on the street corner with a typewriter relates to the goldfish in his apartment that he continues to obsess over. It may be a good idea to switch the placement of some of these scenes, or to at least use a little more narration to explain why these scenes are out of place. Fish Eye does a good job at employing narration (once again, another similarity to Fight Club). Though Hollywood tends to want to avoid narration, it's a good convention that, if done well, can significantly enhance the quality of the film, because it adds a psychology to the character or characters who are doing the talking. And in a film like Fish Eye that already is significantly psychological, it's definitely something that shouldn't be lost.

Visual Look
Without a doubt, the best effect in this movie are those that seem to be from the fish's point of view. I don't know how these filmmakers managed to get these shots from inside the aquarium, but they are quite impressive. Not only do these shots just look cool, they also are a nice reflection of how trapped Alex feels by his own life, and how taking care of this fish reminds him of his own claustrophobia.

He talks to people about their life experiences...
...and imagines himself as an observer in their world.

Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique