Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
   Final Film Critique: 
   Film 101

   Director:
Kevin Desmond
   Expected Rating: R due to language
   Production Co.: First Instinct Pictures
   Distribution: No Exclusive Distribution
   Budget:$14,000
   Genre: Comedy/Drama

   Running Time: 90 minutes

   Release Dates: February 15, 2006
   Website: http://www.film101themovie.com
   Trailer: Click Here
   Review Date: June 15, 2006
   Reviewed By: Jeremy Hanke
Final Score:
8.6
How do we critique films? Click Here To See.

They say that you have ten minutes to pull someone into a movie, otherwise there's a good chance you've lost them for good.

While this is a good concept to keep in mind as you make films, I would crystalize it a little further: Creating a film is like creating a 90 minute roller coaster ride for your audience. If you can arrest all of their senses in the first ten minutes, then they will hang on for dear life and pray that the entire ride continues to be this good all the way to the end. If, on the other hand, you can not grab their interest in that introductory time span, they will either bail out of the ride midway through its run or they will simply endure the ride until its shaky ending, never to return to the ride again.

The wonderful thing about Film 101 is that it quickly pulls you into its drive and humor so that you';re holding on and praying that it finishes as strong as it begins.

The story of Film 101 is the story of Kevin, a disaffected business student that has switched his major to film studies, much to the dismay of his conservative Indian mother. In order to prove to her, his friends, and himself that film is the right career for him, he must complete a killer thesis film to graduate and hopefully get him into the film schools in either New York or LA.

Kevin has many of the same filmmaker friends that many of us as filmmakers are very familiar with: mostly ones who think they can accomplish anything without having any experience doing so. With their staunch initial support, Kevin decides that his thesis film will be a "brilliant action short" shot on "glorious 16mm color film".

In order to fund this glorious project, he tries to get his mother to contribute the entire $4,000 budget for his film. When she tells him that she doesn't have that sort of money, he turns to his savings, selling blood, and cash advances on his credit card to make his film on a much more modest budget.

He has decided that four days should easily be enough time to create his action opus, complete with martial arts sequences and gun battles. Of course, he quickly finds that there are a host of problems that get in his way as he works to make his film, especially when dealing with an all volunteer crew. For instance, his fellow student cameraman is not as familiar with the 16mm camera as he thought he was, and ends up shooting an entire day with the film loaded in upside down. The gaffer is uncertain how to light color film and the main female star, Kevin's Russian girlfriend, Anji, quits the production after only one day of shooting. Now Kevin must track down replacement leading ladies, track down rapidly disappearing volunteers, and keep his sanity as his brilliant opus spins radically out of control.

While the film will definitely appeal to every low-budget filmmaker alive, it's got enough humor and insight throughout that a non-film person could watch it and find it quite enjoyable, feeling somewhat like a cross between Indie-phenom Swingers and Hollywood's slapstick Bowfinger.

From the actor who wants to be
in the gay mafia...
...to the less than understanding cop,
Kevin's film has lots and lots of issues.

Content
Although the story and premise of Film 101 are very good and enjoyable, there are two issues that would help unify the film more.

The first thing that would help the content of the film is more connection of Kevin with an actual college project. This could be accomplished by having some reference to a class related deadline, as well as a quick scene of Kevin in his filmmaking class somewhere in the course of the film. This is important because, although Kevin refers to his film as a thesis project, he has actually told his mother that he is dropping out of being a business major at college. Because we hear almost no mention of his current college again and only hear mention of the colleges he would like to get into, it can become easy to think that he's completely dropped out of school and is making a film to try to gain entry to one of the prestigious film schools he's got his eye on. To remove this confusion, having a quick scene of him in his film class would help out, as well as introduce his instructor, who has an important role in the ending scene.

This brings us to the greater of the two issues: the ending. The reason this is a major issue is because there are currently three separate endings, rather than a single unified ending.

Warning: In order to bring up the issues and possible solutions with the endings, I will have to explain what endings are currently in place, which will obviously include ending spoilers.

Ending #1:
As Kevin's project descends into chaos, he loses more and more of his actors and crew, until, eventually, he is unable to complete his film, tells off Dong Su, his best friend and co-writer, and must show up for his final thesis presentation at the college theater with only a partially completed film. (There were no subtitles to delineate that this as the day of the thesis showing or that he is at his local college, which can confuse audience members who might easily think that he is somehow showing this at a local art house movie theater somewhere. More on that in the Visual Look section.) Because the film won't stand on its own, he has to explain what he's got of the film and tell what he intended.

Apparently Kevin is the last to present his film, as most of the class has filed away by the time he finishes up, leaving only a few local spectators and his professor in the audience. Kevin goes to sit down with her and she explains the old adage of the pyramid of filmmaking: Fast, Cheap, and Good; you can only choose two. Kevin agrees with this sentiment and then wonders if he'll have what it takes to really make it as a filmmaker. In an effort to make him realize that "if it's fated to be, it will happen", his instructor tells him a rambling tale based around the film Lawrence of Arabia. Unfortunately, the tale is so confusing and obtuse, that the audience has no idea why it comforts Kevin at all and how he comes up with whatever insight his teacher is trying to convey.

[Note to Director: This scene felt very much like you were very familiar with Lawrence of Arabia and assumed that your audience would be as well. Unfortunately, many people are not and the amount of explanation for this scene is insufficient for most people. Additionally, it's not really needed due to the final conclusion of the film.]

After this tale, that somehow encourages Kevin, he leaves the auditorium and runs into his best friend that he had previously told off. They repair their friendship with an understanding hug. End of ending #1.

Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique