Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
Final Critique: Dead Time, Pg. 3

Use of Budget
£1-2,000 (approx. $1,900 – 4,000 US) is not a very large budget at all, and for a feature-length film, it's downright impressive. And even though there were only three characters in the cast, minimal set decoration, only a handful of locations, and no fancy camera moves or stunts, I'd say that this money was still quite well-spent. This film probably took a good deal of time to shoot as it includes both indoor and outdoor scenes, most of which were shot in daylight, which can get really tricky to complete, especially when shooting with natural light. And in that respect, it seems that the filmmakers did a good job at budgeting their time as well.

However, it seems as though there should have been at least some money allocated to getting a musical score to put in the background, and also a little bit of Foley/ADR effects in post production to fix some of the mismatched audio.

But the biggest issue is that more time definitely should have been put into script development during pre-production, especially considering that the film as it stands now is very difficult to understand. As much of a pain as it is to wait longer to begin shooting a movie, or even to spend extra money up front in refining a script, it's a hundred times worse to complete shooting and find that all the money spent was wasted on footage that can't be used.

But eventually Orna begins to realize...
...the awful truth about their mysterious visitor.

Lasting Appeal
The thing about the psychodrama genre is that audiences expect them to be mysterious and difficult to understand, and in that respect they are often more willing to stick around longer to wait for the big payoff at the end. However, it's still a fine line that a filmmaker has to walk between being too mysterious and too predictable. And Dead Time suffers significantly because it seems to hit both of these pitfalls. On the one hand, the plot of a woman coming back from the dead seems obvious from the very beginning, which just makes the movie drag. On the other hand, the concept of a creative mind being overcome by her own imagination -while it is an interesting idea- is almost impossible for the audience to determine if that is, in fact, a part of the story, as the film's structure makes it difficult to tell.

This is really unfortunate, however, because the story itself is an interesting one and could make for quite a nail-biter, if told correctly. And as the visual look of this film still quite strong, it would be a shame to put all this footage to waste. My suggestion would be to get a new screenwriter -someone who was not involved in this film's initial production in any way- to look at both the original script and the film. Then they should try to re-work the story into either a short film or another feature-length, using as much of the original footage as possible. Once one has put a lot of time into making a movie, it's nearly impossible to make such significant changes as by then one is quite attached to the film; this is why it's so important for these filmmakers to find a completely new screenwriter. There will probably be a need for some re-shoots, additional scenes, and a lot of narration, but it's much, much better than having to start again from scratch, especially when this movie is still quite fixable.

Overall Comment
This story has definite potential. Since Alfred Hitchcock, the modern psychological thriller has re-gained significant prominence within the past decade, thanks mostly in part to the work of director M. Night Shyamalan. People really like to see these types of movies, and anyone who can make a good one -especially on such a low budget- has a really good shot at getting their film bought.

Still, the fact remains that this particular movie's structure has more than a healthy level of confusion and that makes it very difficult to watch. But the film itself still looks good, and it was quite remarkable that these filmmakers were able to get so much out of such a small budget. Seeing as how they've already put a lot of time and money into it already, I'd hate to see that go to waste. I'd encourage them to do whatever they can to fix the story issues that are still remaining, because the final result could be quite an excellent movie.

 
Content            
      2.5         
Visual Look            
      8.6         
Use of Audio            
7.3         
Use of Budget            
8.0         
           Lasting Appeal            
           1.5         
Overall Score           
  5.6         
How do we critique films? Click Here To See.

Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique