Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
   Final Film Critique: 
   3

   Director:
Steve Piper
   Expected Rating: R due to language and                                violence
   Distribution: No Exclusive Distribution
   Budget: £50 ($80)
   Genre: Drama

   Running Time: 3 minutes

   Release Dates: June 15, 2005
   Website: http://www.coffeefilms.com/3
   Trailer: Click Here
   Review Date: June 15, 2006
   Reviewed By: Monika DeLeeuw-Taylor
Final Score:
8.8
How do we critique films? Click Here To See.

Lee (David House) gets a visit from his friend Jon (Mat Betteridge) one afternoon. Though Lee is in the midst of playing a video game, he can tell that Jon is more than a little depressed. Sounding very dazed, Jon tells Lee that he's just come from a very intense fight with his girlfriend Sarah (Sarah Harvey-Smart). Sarah told Jon something that not only did he not want to hear, but that Lee will not want to hear either.

I apologize for such a short summary, but as this film is only three minutes long and as I don't really want to give away the ending, there's not much else I can say.

This short film tells the story of two friends...
...and the girlfriend that comes between them.

Content
As this short is only three minutes, the story obviously has to be very simple and concise, and the point of the movie has to become clear very soon. This is done well, but the filmmaker also showed a good amount of restraint in not jumping into the plot too quickly; this at least keeps the audience interested and questioning as to what is going to happen. At first I assumed that this film might be a comedy, as it seemed that it would be very difficult to pull off a convincing drama in three minutes, but I was quite surprised. This type of fight between boyfriend and girlfriend is one that every audience can relate to, so the storyline can move pretty quickly without having to pause for any type of long, complicated plot exposition.

The acting itself was excellent. David House did a good job as the distracted, yet vaguely concerned best friend, Mat Betteridge was also good as the dejected and dazed boyfriend, but my favorite performance by far was Sarah Harvey-Smart's portrayal of Jon's girlfriend. At the point in the movie where Jon is talking to Lee about the fight, there is a sudden cutaway to Sarah screaming obscenities and insults into the camera (my favorite of which would be when she says that Jon was the, "Worst shag of my entire life!").

Incidentally, the fact that the title of the movie is "3", there are three characters, and the film itself is three minutes long, is a very nice touch; I definitely wouldn't have thought of that!

Visual Look
I really like the placement of the camera in Lee's apartment. Not only is Lee sitting on a very low couch, but the camera is lowered to his level so that when the characters are standing, they are cut off at just above waist level. This is a really nice touch and it keeps the scene more visually interesting than just two guys sitting together on a couch.

The scene between Jon and Lee was shot on DV but treated in post to look like Super-8, while the scene with Sarah yelling was shot on DV with no noticeable post treatment. This is why the Jon-and-Lee scene looked a little grainy and had a slightly bluish tint. My guess is that the director wanted to make a distinction between the scene with the two friends and that of Jon's fight with his girlfriend, which does in fact work (especially since the warmer colors in Sarah's apartment are much harsher, and the cooler tint of Lee's apartment lull the audience into more of a false sense of security). Still, I think that the contrast is perhaps just a bit much.

However, if, for example, the camera was meant to be in the place of the television, then the graininess and odd coloring would make a little more sense (though, considering the direction in which Lee is facing while playing his video game, that explanation wouldn't make a whole lot of sense.) In any case, it might be beneficial to do just leave the scene in un-cheated DV. If there's no good reason to switch format, one shouldn't really try to do it at all, as in the end this will lead to a very mismatched-looking film.

Use of Audio
For the most part, the dialogue in this film is very understandable; most impressive are the cutaways to Sarah, because even though she;s screaming at the top of her lungs, her dialogue is clearly intelligible. On the other hand, Jon and Lee's audio sounds a little strange as it seems to echo a little too much for an indoor room. Though this does create a clear contrast between Lee's and Sarah's apartments, it seems as though it might be a good idea to ADR the dialogue between Jon and Lee or to tweak it and get rid of the echo. We will be doing an issue on ADR shortly, but you might want to check out Vocalign, a software that simplfies the synching process for ADR.

Also, the music in the background was good; it added to the dramatic feeling of the story, but wasn't too overpowering. My only complaint was that, since Lee was playing a video game, we ought to have heard some sounds of that game going on in the background. Or perhaps, instead of using music, to make the video game effects the primary ambient sound, especially if it is a particularly violent game that can make noise throughout the exchange between Jon and Lee and continue on even as the movie ends. I think this would add a rather ironic twist to the story itself.

Use of Budget
The great thing about films like "3" is that they can be shot so cheaply - there were only three actors, two locations, minimal sets, and easy dialogue, so it couldn't have taken much more than a day to shoot or have a high price tag. In fact, the director said that the majority of the £50 ($80) budget was spent on transportation for the actors. In any case, considering that the final project is a pretty strong movie that has already had some showings at film festivals, I'd say that was money well spent!

Lasting Appeal
This is a really interesting short film, and it does a good job at getting across a cohesive plot in such a short period of time. Even non-indie film people can recognize this story, and will definitely be hit hard with the ending once it arrives. Barring a few minor technical issues which could stand some tweaking, it's a really well-done short film.

Overall Comment
Everyone at some point in their lives has had to deal with a fight with a boyfriend or girlfriend, and understands how harrowing this can be.

 
Content            
      9.5         
Visual Look            
      8.1         
Use of Audio            
7.7         
Use of Budget            
9.5         
           Lasting Appeal            
           9.0         
Overall Score           
  8.8         
How do we critique films? Click Here To See.

Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique