Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
Final Critique: The Boy With A Thorn In His Side, Pg. 2

Also, there are a couple instances in which, in the middle of a scene, Billy turns to the camera and has a sort of a private dialogue with the "interviewer." For example, after spending a night out with Susan, Billy follows her back to her apartment, and the two have a brief discussion in the hallway. In the midst of the conversation, Billy turns to look at the camera and expresses his desire to kiss Susan. Even in light of previous "interview" scenes, this type of "aside" still seems very awkward. I think it would be a better choice to cut to the interview setting where Billy could have these private conversations with himself.

In addition, there is no sort of visual break between the film itself and these "interviews." The sudden cuts between the two can be very confusing for the audience, especially since the interviewer's voice is often muffled and hard to understand. I think it would be easier on the audience if these interview segments were shown in a different style (black and white, for example), just to give a clear differentiation between the thoughts of the characters and the "real" world. It would probably also be a good idea to use a distinctive transition between these segments, such as a white dissolve - it's rather boring, but it's a convention that your audience will recognize.

Toward the middle and end of the movie, the story does tend to drag a little bit. It might be a good idea to tighten up some of the scenes, maybe get rid of some minor ones, and put in a few more of these interview scenes to keep it interesting. These little vignettes match well with the random nature of the film, as well as the psychology of the main character. So long as they aren't overdone, they'll not only add to the film, but will help a lot with the pacing.

Visual Look
This film does a good job at keeping things visually interesting. There are several good shot montages throughout that help to show the passage of time. My favorite is a sequence in which Billy is working at several different menial jobs, such as garbage collector, janitor, sausage stuffer, and, dressed in a mascot uniform, flyer distributor. These various scenes are sped up and put to music that shows the monotony of Billy's period of employment. There are several other shot montages where time is sped up -- it's a great technique to get across the passage of time without boring the audience, plus the format works great with a comedy of this nature.

There were a few moments, however, when the changing speed of images got a little out of hand. For instance, at the very beginning of the movie when we first see Billy's character, he is initially shown walking in slow-motion which then changes to a fast-motion shot. This is very visually jarring, and doesn't seem to serve much of a purpose. It would be a good idea to choose one or the other, or perhaps just show him walking at normal speed.

[Note to the Director: It might even be interesting to open the film with an interview shot of Billy talking randomly about his awful life, and then cut directly into the opening credits. This would tie in with his rather ADD nature.]
In fact, the only person around him who isn't completely crazy...
...Is his ex-girlfriend, Susan.

This film also has a lot of random cutaways, which fit in well with Billy's almost ADD personality. While having lunch with Susan, he is talking about all the stress in his life -- which is strange, considering how he really doesn't do much of anything -- and all the different ways in which he has tried to cope with said stress. These methods include going to a Buddhist meditation group and an acupuncturist. During his conversation with Susan, there are some brief cutaways to Billy at both the meditation group and the acupuncturist. Using visual cutaways can be tricky, because sometimes it ends up looking cheesy, but these particular shots do a lot to add to the humor of the film. Though, as with the interview-type segments, it might also be a good idea to differentiate between them as well, once again by using a different color scheme and/or dissolves.

There weren't any major white balance or color issues that I noticed, though there were some slight color inconsistencies in a few of the indoor/outdoor scenes. I was impressed with the scene where Billy, Susan, and his parents are watching TV and there are several cutaways to the TV screen itself. Shooting an image of a television is very difficult, but in this instance the filmmaker did a very good job.

A lot of the film appears to have been shot handheld. This format seems to match well with the haphazard way in which the main character lives his life, but when shooting handheld there's always the danger that your audience will get seasick. I am seldom bothered by moving shots, but there were a few instances where I even started to get a bit of a headache due to the movement of the camera. In those cases, the film ceases to look like a movie and more like The Blair Witch Project gone wrong. It may be a good idea to find less shaky takes, or even to do a couple reshoots of some of these scenes.

Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique