Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
Final Short Critique: Between You and Me, Pg. 2

Finally, when the protagonist succeeds in rescuing the girl, she appears to run off in the same direction as her attacker. It's difficult to see if this is in fact the case, since the attack takes place at night, but in the shots where the girl runs away, there seems to be a shadowy figure running in the same direction, which I took to be her assailant. This seems to make no sense, since one would think that she would try to run in the opposite direction. It might be a good idea to do a quick re-shoot or to use different footage in order to clarify that fact.

But when she is attacked later
that evening
...
...a Good Samaritan
comes to her aid.


Visual Look
Without a doubt, the most interesting aspect of this film is its visual look. Rather than being shot on a normal film or video camera, director Patryk Rebisz experimented with using the burst mode on a digital still camera. Burst mode is a setting in which multiple pictures are taken in rapid succession; so long as the shutter is depressed, the camera continues taking pictures. A friend of Rebisz had recently bought a Canon EOS 20D, whose burst mode recorded at five frames per second (standard film shoots at 24). However, the camera could only shoot for about 12 seconds before the memory card filled up and the filmmakers had to empty the card to a laptop, so the shots had to be short and concise. This seems like it could have been quite a hassle, but I actually think it added to the look of the film. It's important that your look match your medium, and any long and complicated camera movements would look very out of place in this film - which is essentially a story told in pictures.

One advantage to shooting a film in this manner is that there can be less concern for shaky camera movements. So long as the images are not too blurry - which is pretty easy to avoid with a good digital camera. There were some moments in the film where the images blurred, but they coincided with the attack on the female protagonist, so they matched the rather frantic mood of the moment.

One disadvantage of using photographs would be some aspects of continuity, because certain pictures may look better than others, but would not match in color or action. And digital cameras can be notoriously difficult to keep a uniform color, especially when moving from indoors to outdoors and in all different lighting conditions. However, Rebisz did a very good job at keeping the white balance consistent, considering that this film was shot in both interiors and exteriors, during the day, evening, and a night.

Use of Audio
The background music used in the film was very good. It was subtle without being too overpowering - which can be tempting in a film with no actual dialogue. The music also matched the mood of the film very well. In addition - something that I thought was very clever - the director added a "clicker" sound effect to the background in order to indicate that the viewer was watching a series of photographs; not a film that kept dropping frames or a poorly-compressed web movie. I didn't really even notice the sound effect - a good indication of its subtlety - but it didn't take me long at all to catch on to the fact that photos were being used.

The audio in the film was mostly background music; however there were some added sound effects particularly in the scene in which the girl is being attacked. In most films it seems inconsistent to use sound effects in only a few places (i.e. using sound effects during an assault scene, but not while a character is jogging), even when there is music underscoring the entire film. But because of the slideshow-esque nature of this film, it didn't seem all that strange to go without sound effects in its less intense moments.

But the girl drops her camera
in the process
...
...leaving her rescuer with only
pictures as clues of where to find her.

Use of Budget
Although the film is a montage of still pictures, the amount of time required to obtain them all in the varied locations they occur in would be considerable. This time crunch is even larger because the camera the director used could only store 12 seconds worth of pictures at a time. As such, with the amount of time required to do this well as well as feeding his talent in that time, $20 is quite impressive.

Lasting Appeal
This type of slideshow-type movie has been done before (usually on kids programs or "Mad TV"), but it usually isn't paired with the dramatic in the way that Rebisz has done here.

Overall Comments
This is a very visually interesting film, and though sometimes visual interest can be used to cover up a less-than-stellar story (i.e. The Truth About Charlie), that is definitely not the case in Between You And Me. This film is technically well-done, with a story to match. Director Patryk Rebisz took an experiment in technology and came out of it with an excellent and compelling short film.

 
Content            
      8.0         
Visual Look            
      8.9         
Use of Audio            
9.0         
Use of Budget            
9.0         
           Lasting Appeal            
           9.5         
Overall Score           
  8.9         
How do we critique films? Click Here To See.


The author of half a dozen screen plays, two novels, and a proficient camera-woman in her own right, Monika DeLeeuw-Taylor is Microfilmmaker's lead writing analyst and one of our top film reviewers. When she's not writing a critique for Microfilmmaker, she's writing screenplays for Viking Productions.

Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique