Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
Final Critique: 89¢, Pg. 2
The decision facing Agim is a cell
phone for his convenience
...
...or choosing self sacrifice to help
a child in need.

Use of Audio
I really liked the music used in this film. It was very calm and dreamlike, yet it carried some strains of tension that matched well with the feel of the movie.

There were, however, a few audio issues, one of which is some instances where the sound effects were a little too loud and they almost seem to overpower the main action. One example of this is at the end when Agim is on the phone, a loud sound effect of someone typing can be heard. This sound effect goes on for quite a while before someone starts speaking, so this sound initially seems very confusing, plus the volume is almost as loud as the voice of the person speaking, which doesn't match very well. The sound effect should either be quieter or just eliminated altogether.

Probably one of the biggest sound issues was that of the philosophical voice-overs of the blind beggar. Since the film is centered on philosophical ideas, these sound bytes are probably the most important - it is important that the audience be able to hear them. The effect that they give is very good, as both Agim and the blind man are almost whispering - an interesting change that sets a very contemplative mood. However, sometimes whispering is hard to understand, especially since the volume of these sections of audio was very low in comparison to the rest of the sound throughout the film. When watching the movie, I had to turn the sound all the way up just to hear it, and then I still wasn't able to fully understand what was being said. Since these philosophical exchanges are so important to the film, this audio problem really needs to be fixed in order for the audience to truly understand the movie. (Probably the only way to deal with this is through ADR, as boosting a whisper usually results in a lot of background garbage getting boosted with it. We will be doing an article on ADR in an issue or two.)

Use of Budget
For a movie that has such a simple look, $8500 seems like a lot of money to spend, though, if equipment price was factored into the Budget, then the $5000 Canon XL2 and the $500 Final Cut HD software that was used explain a good chunk of it.

Agim comes out of his dream...
...having made a decision about
what he will do.

Lasting Appeal
The creators of this movie did a very good job at condensing such a deep philosophical subject into a visually and mentally interesting film. Given some minor changes, I would definitely watch it again.

Though I'm not sure how most people would react to the artsy feel of this movie, there are probably a good number of people who would enjoy it. I'm planning to show it to my friends who are Fight Club fans; and I'm almost positive they'll love it.

Overall Comments
This is a very interesting movie. It discusses a lofty theme, but in a creative and down-to-earth way. The visual look is very simple, yet interesting and complex. It asks more questions than it answers, but still wraps up a lot of its plot at the end. It is a compelling movie that gets the audience to think about things, much in the style of Fight Club, Memento, or American History X. This film does have a more arthouse look to it, and as a result it might not be received well by some more mainstream film fans, but, after a few minor editing and audio changes have been made, I'm betting that there will be a lot of people out there who would really like this film.

 
Content            
      8.1         
Visual Look            
      8.3         
Use of Audio            
7.9         
Use of Budget            
7.0         
           Lasting Appeal            
           8.0         
Overall Score           
  8.0         
How do we critique films? Click Here To See.


The author of half a dozen screen plays, two novels, and a proficient camera-woman in her own right, Monika DeLeeuw-Taylor is Microfilmmaker's lead writing analyst and one of our top film reviewers. When she's not writing a critique for Microfilmmaker, she's writing screenplays for Viking Productions.


Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique