|
|
Despite
the good things in the movie, there were a few issues
that need to be corrected.
One
of the biggest issues cropped up in the form of an interview
sequence in the middle of the film. None of the footage
in this interview makes it into the final show reel,
yet, for some reason, it's in color. However, the color
is not as saturated as the final show reel and, to make
matters worse, is actually shot from two different brands
of cameras with two different color spectrums. If it
was necessary for this to be in color, this would mean
that this segment needed to be seriously color corrected,
because it sticks out like a sore thumb. However, because
it's right in the midst of the raw footage and because
it doesn't show up in the ending show reel, the better
correction would just be to desaturate the footage to
look like the rest of the rough black and white footage
in the film.
Another
color issue occurs during the opening scene of the film
with the crew driving to Brett's apartment. It initially
starts out in color, then later switches to black and
white. This seems like an odd transition and it's hard
to tell why the filmmakers made this decision. It's
so short, in fact, that it's possible that it was a
rendering glitch that didn't get caught before it was
burned to DVD. If it was intentional, then it would
probably be better to just leave all te raw-footage
portion of the film in black and white - this gives
the film a consistent look, and makes a nicer contrast
between that portion and Brett's color show reel.
Another
editing issue crops up in the form of random dissolves,
which are almost never done in actual documentaries.
Because the camera would be simply shut off in a raw
footage situation, these dissolves distract from the
continuity feel of the film. Additionally, they just
don't look good.
The
last issue I had was with the scrolling text in the
closing credits. The idea was great - showing scrolling
text that explained what happened to the crew after
the show reel was complete. This is something that is
usually done in serious films that are based on real
life, but incorporating them into this film really added
to it. The only problem was that the font chosen was
a little difficult to read, and the text seemed to scroll
a little too quickly. I found myself having to pause
the DVD just to catch what was being said. It may be
a good idea to just pick a simple sans serif font such
as Arial (yes, I know it's boring, but it is readable),
and slow the scrolling down a little bit. I was once
told that if a fast reader can read through the text
on screen at least three times then it should be up
long enough for the slower members of the audience to
be able to catch it.
Use
of Audio
One
of the things that American audiences seem to find most
interesting about British films is - obviously - the
accents of the characters, so long as they can understand
what is being said. This film did a fairly good job
in keeping the dialogue clean, though there were issues
with spiking when Massive Johnson would get too loud,
which resulted in a slight pinging sound, and, during
the interview portion, the interviewer was usually a
little muffled. While the pinging audio can be seen
past due to the documentary feel to much of the film,
the background interview questions should be re-recorded
to make them easier to understand.
Additionally,
when they go outside the appartment to locations like
a pub, the park, and inside a car as they drive around,
the ambience and volume are much too high in comparison
to the volume of the rest of the film. While lowering
the outdoor volume helps some, there are enough ambience
muffling issues that these sequences probably need to
be redubbed. [Note to the Director: You can try running
these segments through an audio cleaning software like
Soundsoap or Diamond Cut 6, but the sheer amount of
ambience will probably result in your audio breaking
apart. As such, redubbing these segments with ADR is
probably the only solution. (In March we will be doing
an ADR issue, BTW.) For future films, use of a shotgun
microphone like a Sennheizer ME67 with a windsock will
help immensely. While that mic will probably run you
about £355 new, you can usually find it for half
that on ebay and it's an excellent investment for future
films.]
There
wasn't a lot of music underscoring the film, but what
was there matched the mood very well.
|
|
|
|