Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
   Final Film Critique: 
   The Intersection

   Director:
Peter Matsoukas
   Expected Rating: R due to profanity and
                               violence
   Distribution: No Exclusive Distribution
   Budget: $6500
   Genre: Noir/Mystery

   Running Time: 71 minutes

   Release Dates: April 1, 2005
   Website: http://www.rockscarfilms.com
   Trailer: None Available

   Review Date:
December 15, 2005
   Reviewed By: Jeremy Hanke


It is said that if you stand in the intersection at Times Square for 24 hours, you cannot fail to run into someone that you know or who knows someone you know. While this is based on the laws of probability and statistics, director Peter Matsoukas took that idea and ran with it. However, rather than dealing with an intersection at Times Square, he decided to look at a non-famous intersection. Over the course of 48 hours, he examines how a group of six people all end up interacting with one another with the single common denominator being the intersection it occurs on.

There's no way to review this film without giving some of the film's secrets away. As such, I will try to be discreet as possible.

The story of the Intersection is the story of six people. Or rather, it's the story of three people and three people that make their lives problematic.

Cole is a schizophrenic with social difficulties and violent tendencies. He begins the movie by beating his boss to death because he feels persecuted and then begins to look for a way out of the city.

Ron is a manipulative hedonist that keeps a woman named Ruby in an apartment for easy access when he's horny and has a variety of other women "stashed" around the city. He's so used to getting his way that, when he runs into a woman named Dori, who wouldn't have sex with him, he decides to try and rape her.

Ruby is Ron's kept woman who lives in the apartment he provides. She longs to go out into the real world, but he forces her to stay in the apartment. Eventually she grows resentful and refuses to have sex with him until he takes her out into the big city with him.

Martin is an introspective screenwriter that is shacked up with Dori. He's so introspective that he doesn't realize that he's losing her until it's too late.

Dori is a tramp that has had a few affairs outside of her boyfriend, Martin, and has finally settled on the idea of moving on from him to her new squeeze, Kyle. What she doesn't count on is running into Ron as she's on her way home to officially break up with Martin.

Kyle is Dori's new squeeze and is the least emotionally disturbed of the six people in the film. He feels bad about sneaking around with Dori behind Martin's back, even though he doesn't know Martin. He forces Dori to go out and break it off with Martin before he'll continue to sleep with her.

Martin is a scriptwriter that is
struggling with writer's block...
...and with his girlfriend, Dori,
cheating on him.

When Cole happens to run into the attempted rape of Dori, he defends her and protects her. Ron, prevented from having his way for a second time with the same woman, is full of impotent rage, this time directed at Cole. Meanwhile, when Martin realizes that Dori is having an affair on him, he too is full of impotent rage at how she could make a mockery of him, though his rage is directed at Dori's lover.

In the end, this movie shows us that our lives are not so neat and tidy as we would expect. And when our lives spill out on other people, trivial details can become anything but!

Content
The style of this film is somewhat like Pulp Fiction in that pieces of the puzzle are given to you out of order and then, in the end, you must reconstruct the puzzle in your head. When I finished the film, I felt confused but was able to reconstruct the only logical answer in my head through the comment from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, "Once you've ruled out the impossible, whatever's left, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."

This is where The Intersection ran into problems: the improbable. In order for the ending of the film to make sense, we must assume certain things about certain characters that are not presented in the film.

The most crucial example is, for the ending to make sense, we must assume that Ron is a violent man, or at least has the potential to be seriously violent, yet we are never shown this in the movie. Sure, he supposedly tries to rape Dori, yet all he ends up doing is tussling with her without any competence and with no weapon. It would be like Carlton from Fresh Prince of Bel-Air or Napoleon Dynamite trying to rape someone, kind of sadly ludicrous. (Dori took so little damage in the "assault" that one couldn't help but notice that she didn't even look like she'd been in a scuffle at all.) Other than that moment of strained violence, we don't ever see him get angry enough or violent enough to make us believe that he's a violent man.

Now, the film is currently at an awkward length of 71 minutes, which is too short for major theatrical distribution, and too long to be a short film. As such, I would recommend shooting some additional footage with Ron to show that he has the potential to be seriously violent. This extra footage would bring the film closer to 90 minutes in length and would make the film work better as a whole.

Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique