Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
Final Critique: Disturbing Images, Pg. 3

Use of Audio
There wasn’t a lot of music in this film, just some introduction/theme music over the opening credits, but I really liked it. Though I did think it might be a good idea to introduce a few more bits of score in certain places, such as at the bits of narration in the documentary, and during the more dramatic parts of the movie.

The audio and dialogue was quite good, though I noticed that sometimes the volume dips a bit and it’s rather hard to hear. Helmut’s voice, particularly can be difficult to understand at times, since he’ll go from yelling at the top of his lungs to whispering in a matter of seconds. This is a great character quality, but a soundman’s nightmare. In addition, I noticed that the audio of the art historian echos a lot. This was probably due to there being too many reflective surfaces in the room in which the footage was shot. Both of these issues can be either cleaned up in an audio software program, or perhaps by some ADR in post.

Use of Budget
For a feature-length film, Disturbing Images’ $6,000 price tag is quite impressive. There was a large cast - all good actors with impressive resumes; several different sets – including Helmut’s studio/loft apartment which I really liked; and some very nice camerawork. This is even more impressive when you consider that the majority of the budget was used to buy the essentials – equipment and software – meaning that these filmmakers probably scored a lot of their talent and sets for free. However, I do think that more time and care should have been spent on better organizing the script and editing the final project. It’s a really good story and telling it in documentary form is a great idea. However, in it’s present form, it’s just too confusing for an audience to keep track of. I would encourage these filmmakers to perhaps get together with a screenwriter and/or editor who had no connection with shooting the film in the first place and try to re-organize it into a much more cohesive story. Disturbing Images really has some great qualities to it – like the acting, for example – and it’s a story that really deserves to be told.

But when Helmut seduces a member
of a local pastor's congregation
...
...The pastor decides he must put a stop to Helmut, no the cost.

Lasting Appeal
Even though this film is billed as a comedy, I didn’t really find it all that humorous. It was more contemplative than anything else, as well as being slightly disturbing. I really liked the documentary aspect of the film (even though I do think the editing needs a bit of work,) and I took away a couple good lessons from it.

As an artist myself, it’s easy to be drawn into the “anything goes” world of the Bohemian, where the objective becomes not to make good art that will benefit society, but instead to make the most outlandish product that will shock anyone who comes to see it. Artists tend to be driven to become the next Picasso that they will throw anything out as “art,” and find themselves waxing eloquent about creations they don’t care about simply to get ahead. However, on the other hand, as a religious person I must not let my faith cloud my judgment or become too critical of art that I don’t like at first glance. Faith and art can co-exist peacefully if given a chance – each can serve to temper and enhance the other. But far too often they find themselves butting heads and causing chaos.

Overall Comment
Art is by nature controversial. Each new movement of artists sought to push the envelope of acceptability by forsaking the ideals of their predecessors and venturing out into uncharted territory. But as each new movement arose, there came a rousing sound of protest from a shocked and offended public. Whether from Goya’s anonymous Nude Maja, Manet’s scandalous nudes in Olympia and Le Dejeunur sur L’herbe, Duchamp’s urinal “water fountain,” or Picasso’s disturbing World War II imagery in Guernica, a viewing public has often responded negatively to any strange or unusual trends in the art world, only to later hail such artists as geniuses.

The trend today is now for artists to attempt to follow in the footsteps of their predecessors by pushing the envelope to such extreme limits in hope that they will be recognized for their contributions in the future. But the danger comes when the art becomes so extreme that it takes over the artist’s life and threatens to destroy the lives of those around him as well. Though Helmut’s story is fictional, it could serve as a warning to both the artist and the viewer – there is such a thing as an artist going too far, but the same holds true for those who find said art offensive and unnecessary.

 
Content            
      7.0         
Visual Look            
      8.2         
Use of Audio            
8.3         
Use of Budget            
7.5         
           Lasting Appeal            
           8.0         
Overall Score           
  7.8         
How do we critique films? Click Here To See.
The author of half a dozen screen plays, two novels, and a proficient camera-woman in her own right, Monika DeLeeuw-Taylor is Microfilmmaker's lead writing analyst and one of our top film reviewers. When she's not writing a critique for Microfilmmaker, she's writing screenplays for Viking Productions.

Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique